When Capcom unveiled the future of RE Engine at its 2026 technical conference, one phrase was enough to trigger a fairly predictable reaction: the company wants to build an engine ready for an AI-driven generation of game development.In some discussions, that quickly turned into the idea that future Resident Evil, Monster Hunter or Street Fighter games would be packed with AI-generated environments, characters, stories and artwork.The problem is that Capcom has already said the exact opposite. In March, during a meeting with shareholders, the company said it had no plans to implement AI-generated assets in its games. Its stated goal is to use the technology to improve efficiency and productivity in areas such as programming, sound and graphics. The REX project unveiled now doesn’t contradict that; it helps explain how the company plans to put it into practice.RE Engine has been around since 2014 and is now used by more than 2,000 Capcom employees. As the games have grown, relatively simple tasks have come to involve huge amounts of data, tools and people. REX aims to reorganize that infrastructure with systems such as RE:Dox, RE:UI, RE:Log, RE:Flows and RE:Runtime, creating an engine that’s faster and easier to understand for both developers and AI tools.Source: CapcomThat opens up possibilities far less cinematic than asking ChatGPT to make Resident Evil 10: AI can interpret code, help create it, analyze error logs, run tests and find problems that would otherwise take hours of human work to uncover.Japan is already treating AI as a production toolThis distinction also helps explain why these debates in Japan seem different from those involving parts of the Western audience. A CESA survey released in September polled 1,349 professionals and found that 85.8% of respondents use generative AI at work, with 63% using it daily. That doesn’t mean 85.8% of Japanese games feature AI-generated art; the survey measures professional use of the technology, not whether such material appears in final products.Square Enix, for example, is working with the University of Tokyo to try to automate 70% of QA and debugging tasks by the end of 2027. Sega has also publicly discussed using AI to speed up certain development processes.Source: Square EnixThat’s exactly why reducing every mention of AI to “games made by AI” impoverishes a discussion that should be much more interesting. There are legitimate concerns around copyright, jobs, model training and the replacement of creative work. CESA itself recognizes that adoption must go hand in hand with the protection of rights.In Capcom’s specific case, however, the picture is different. The company hasn’t announced plans to replace artists with prompts or put generative content directly into its games. It’s preparing its core development technology for an environment where people can delegate repetitive, time-consuming parts of production to AI.We can, and should, discuss the limits of this. But first, we need to have a mature discussion about what Capcom actually announced and what other Eastern companies are pursuing.
Reazioni
0
0 Commenti
Diventa il primo a commentare
Niente qui ancora.